Guidelines International Network: Principles for Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Health Guideline Enterprise
- 1 March 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 178 (3) , 408-415
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been defined by the High-Level Expert Group on AI of the European Commission as "systems that display intelligent behaviour by analysing their environment and taking actions-with some degree of autonomy-to achieve specific goals." Artificial intelligence has the potential to support guideline planning, development and adaptation, reporting, implementation, impact evaluation, certification, and appraisal of recommendations, which we will refer to as "guideline enterprise." Considering this potential, as well as the lack of guidance for the use of AI in guidelines, the Guidelines International Network (GIN) proposes a set of principles for the development and use of AI tools or processes to support the health guideline enterprise. A GIN working group on AI developed these principles, informed by the results of a scoping review and practical examples, through iterative discussion. Eight principles were identified to adhere to when using AI in the guideline context: transparency, preplanning, additionality, credibility, ethics, accountability, compliance, and evaluation. These complementary principles are described in a comprehensive way, but they do not provide detailed instructions on how to use specific AI tools. Although these principles are expected to apply across different contexts and stages of the guideline enterprise, details on their implementation have some degree of flexibility. Guideline development groups choosing to use AI will be able to adequately implement the principles if they ensure aspects such as structured reporting on the use of AI tools, involvement of experts in AI, and allocation of funding for the adequate use of AI tools. The GIN principles may support guideline developers in the responsible and transparent use of AI to ensure trustworthy guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical debates amidst flawed healthcare artificial intelligence metricsnpj Digital Medicine, 2024
- Identifying and Addressing Bias in Artificial IntelligenceJAMA Network Open, 2024
- The Ethics of Relational AI — Expanding and Implementing the Belmont PrinciplesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2024
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Human ValuesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2024
- Optimization of hepatological clinical guidelines interpretation by large language models: a retrieval augmented generation-based frameworknpj Digital Medicine, 2024
- Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based modelsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2024
- Is generative pre-trained transformer artificial intelligence (Chat-GPT) a reliable tool for guidelines synthesis? A preliminary evaluation for biologic CRSwNP therapyEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2024
- Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extensionThe Lancet Digital Health, 2020
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extensionThe Lancet Digital Health, 2020
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013