Geographic and demographic heterogeneity of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing in Illinois, USA, March to December 2020
Authors:
Open Access
- 10 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-13
Abstract
Background: Availability of SARS-CoV-2 testing in the United States (U.S.) has fluctuated through the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, including in the U.S. state of Illinois. Despite substantial ramp-up in test volume, access to SARS-CoV-2 testing remains limited, heterogeneous, and insufficient to control spread. Methods: We compared SARS-CoV-2 testing rates across geographic regions, over time, and by demographic characteristics (i.e., age and racial/ethnic groups) in Illinois during March through December 2020. We compared age-matched case fatality ratios and infection fatality ratios through time to estimate the fraction of SARS-CoV-2 infections that have been detected through diagnostic testing. Results: By the end of 2020, initial geographic differences in testing rates had closed substantially. Case fatality ratios were higher in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic/Latino populations in Illinois relative to non-Hispanic White populations, suggesting that tests were insufficient to accurately capture the true burden of COVID-19 disease in the minority populations during the initial epidemic wave. While testing disparities decreased during 2020, Hispanic/Latino populations consistently remained the least tested at 1.87 tests per 1000 population per day compared with 2.58 and 2.87 for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, respectively, at the end of 2020. Despite a large expansion in testing since the beginning of the first wave of the epidemic, we estimated that over half (50–80%) of all SARS-CoV-2 infections were not detected by diagnostic testing and continued to evade surveillance. Conclusions: Systematic methods for identifying relatively under-tested geographic regions and demographic groups may enable policymakers to regularly monitor and evaluate the shifting landscape of diagnostic testing, allowing officials to prioritize allocation of testing resources to reduce disparities in COVID-19 burden and eventually reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Natural History of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Cumulative incidence and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in New YorkAnnals of Epidemiology, 2020
- Disparities In Outcomes Among COVID-19 Patients In A Large Health Care System In CaliforniaHealth Affairs, 2020
- Comprehensive Testing Highlights Racial, Ethnic, and Age Disparities in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristic of Cases in UtahmedRxiv, 2020
- Comparison of Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Asymptomatic vs Symptomatic Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, ChinaJAMA Network Open, 2020
- An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real timeThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contactsThe Lancet Global Health, 2020
- Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysisEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2020
- Age Disparities Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Rates of Hospital Use and Diabetic ComplicationsPreventing Chronic Disease, 2019
- malariaAtlas: an R interface to global malariometric data hosted by the Malaria Atlas ProjectMalaria Journal, 2018