PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy
- 1 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Vascular Access
- Vol. 21 (4) , 460-466
Abstract
The increasing use of arm totally implantable vascular access devices for breast cancer patients who require chemotherapy has led to a greater risk of complications and failures and, in particular, to upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of the arm peripherally inserted central catheter-PORT technique in breast cancer patients. The peripherally inserted central catheter-PORT technique is an evolution of the standard arm-totally implantable vascular access device implant based on guided ultrasound venous access in the proximal third of the upper limb with subsequent placement of the reservoir at the middle third of the arm. A prospective study was conducted on 418 adult female breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The primary study outcome was peripherally inserted central catheter-PORT failure. Median follow-up was 215 days. Complications occurred in 29 patients (6.9%) and failure resulting in removal of the device in 11 patients (2.6%). The main complication we observed was upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, 10 (2.4%); all patients were rescued by anticoagulant treatment without peripherally inserted central catheter-PORT removal. The main reason for removal was reservoir pocket infection: 4 (0.9%) with an infection rate of 0.012 per 1000 catheter days. Cumulative 1-year risk of failure was 3.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.3%–7.1%). With regard to the patients’ characteristics, body mass index p = 0.027). The peripherally inserted central catheter-PORT is a safe vascular device for chemotherapy delivery that achieves similar clinical results as traditional long-term vascular access devices (peripherally inserted central catheter and arm totally implantable vascular access device, in particular) in breast cancer patients.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignanciesSupportive Care in Cancer, 2013
- Pre-filled normal saline syringes to reduce totally implantable venous access device-associated bloodstream infection: a single institution pilot studyJournal of Hospital Infection, 2013
- Central Venous Catheter Care for the Patient With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice GuidelineJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
- Efficacy of Normal Saline Versus Heparinized Saline Solution for Locking Catheters of Totally Implantable Long-Term Central Vascular Access Devices in Adult Cancer PatientsCancer Nursing, 2012
- The Effect of Catheter to Vein Ratio on Blood Flow Rates in a Simulated Model of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous CathetersChest, 2011
- Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infectionsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2011
- PICC Zone Insertion Method™ (ZIM™): A Systematic Approach to Determine the Ideal Insertion Site for PICCs in the Upper ArmJournal of the Association for Vascular Access, 2011
- Patients’ perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system–results from a randomised study in acute leukaemiaSupportive Care in Cancer, 2008
- Risk factors for upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with the use of central vein catheter in cancer patientsInternal and Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignanciesEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2007