Climate change denial is associated with diminished sensitivity in internalizing environmental externalities
Open Access
- 29 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 16 (7) , 074018
Abstract
Espite a strong scientific consensus about the existence of anthropogenic climate change, widespread scepticism in the general population continues to exist. Past research has largely relied on self-reported behaviours or behavioural intentions when investigating downstream ‘behavioural’ consequences of climate change denial. As a consequence, there remains a large gap in the literature about how belief in climate change interacts with the pursuit of self-interested, environmentally harmful behaviours. To fill that gap, the present research uses a novel, experimental economic paradigm that allows to attach true environmental consequences to laboratory decisions. Based on ∼56 000 pollution decisions from 2273 participants in more than 30 countries, we find that belief in climate change meaningfully affects decision-making. Our results show that climate change scepticism predicts self-interested choices and showcases that sceptics have an insensitive acceptance of emissions, reaping benefits no matter how large the climate cost are or how small the personal benefits become. Therefore, our results critically augment meta-analytic evidence arguing that downstream behavioural consequences are small to medium in their effect size. We discuss the use of experimental economic paradigms as a crucial innovation tool for psychological research addressing people’s willingness to engage in climate action.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bundesamt für Energie (SI/502093-01)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate changeNature Climate Change, 2016
- Environmental Impact Assessment of Household ConsumptionJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2015
- Psychological research and global climate changeNature Climate Change, 2015
- The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic reviewJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2014
- Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods gameProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.American Psychologist, 2011
- Expert credibility in climate changeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007
- Free-Market Ideology and Environmental DegradationEnvironment and Behavior, 2006
- Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 2002