Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Interact When Modulating Gastric Physiological Functions in Rodents
Authors:
- Larisse Tavares LucettiLLLarisse Tavares Lucetti
- Mariana Lima ValeMVMariana Lima Vale
- Pedro Marcos Gomes SoaresPSPedro Marcos Gomes Soares
- Pedro Jorge Caldas MagalhãesPMPedro Jorge Caldas Magalhães
- Fernando de Queiroz CunhaFCFernando de Queiroz Cunha
- Jand-Venes Rolim MedeirosJMJand-Venes Rolim Medeiros
- Marcellus Henrique Loiola Ponte SouzaMSMarcellus Henrique Loiola Ponte Souza
- 18 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 62 (1) , 93-104
Abstract
Aim The objective was to evaluate the effects of nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donors and possible interactions between these two systems in modulating gastric function. Methods Mice received saline, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), or sodium hydrosulfite (NaHS), and after 1 h, the animals were killed for immunofluorescence analysis of CSE or eNOS expressions, respectively. Other groups received saline, SNP, NaHS, Lawesson’s reagent (H2S donor), PAG + SNP, l-NAME, l-NAME + NaHS, or l-NAME + Lawesson’s reagent. Then, the gastric secretions (mucous and acid), gastric blood flow, gastric defense against ethanol, and gastric motility (gastric emptying and gastric contractility) were evaluated. Results SNP and NaHS increased the expression of CSE or eNOS, respectively. SNP or Lawesson’s reagent did not alter gastric acid secretion but increased mucus production, and these effects reverted with PAG and l-NAME treatment, respectively. SNP or NaHS increased gastric blood flow and protected the gastric mucosa against ethanol injury, and these effects reverted with PAG and l-NAME treatments, respectively. SNP delayed gastric emptying when compared with saline, and PAG partially reversed this effect. NaHS accelerate gastric emptying, and l-NAME partially reversed this effect. SNP and NaHS alone induced gastric fundus and pylorus relaxation. However, pretreatment with PAG or l-NAME reversed these relaxant effects only in the pylorus but not in the gastric fundus. Conclusion NO and H2S interact in gastric physiological functions, and this “cross-talk” is important in the control of mucus secretion, gastric blood flow, gastric mucosal defense, and gastric motility, but not in the control of basal gastric acid secretion.Keywords
Funding Information
- CNPq
- CAPES
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Embracing sulfide and CO to understand nitric oxide biologyNitric Oxide, 2013
- Hydrogen sulfide: its production, release and functionsAmino Acids, 2010
- Ablation of primary afferent neurons by neonatal capsaicin treatment reduces the susceptibility of the portal hypertensive gastric mucosa to ethanol-induced injury in cirrhotic ratsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 2008
- Gastroprotective Effect of Mangiferin, a Xanthonoid from Mangifera indica, against Gastric Injury Induced by Ethanol and Indomethacin in RodentsPlanta Medica, 2007
- The Emerging Roles of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Gastrointestinal Tract and LiverGastroenterology, 2006
- Two's company, three's a crowd: can H 2 S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter?The FASEB Journal, 2002
- Effects of nitroglycerin on liquid gastric emptying and antropyloroduodenal motilityAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 1998
- Role of nitric oxide in regulation of gastric acid secretion in rats: effects of NO donors and NO synthase inhibitorBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1998
- Nitric oxide generators and cGMP stimulate mucus secretion by rat gastric mucosal cellsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 1993
- Current concepts in gastric microcirculatory pathophysiology.1992