Emergency Medical Service Utilization and Response Following COVID-19 Emergency and Stay-at-Home Policies: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis
Authors:
- Allyson W. O'ConnorAOAllyson W. O'Connor
- Haylea A HannahHHHaylea A Hannah
- Elisabeth A BurnorEBElisabeth A Burnor
- Troy PetersonTPTroy Peterson
- Dustin W. BallardDBDustin W. Ballard
- Rochelle R. EremanRERochelle R. Ereman
- Matthew D. WillisMWMatthew D. Willis
- Orvalho J. AugustoOAOrvalho J. Augusto
- Bradley H. WagenaarBWBradley H. Wagenaar
Open Access
- 21 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 13 (11) , e19794
Abstract
Examine changing emergency medical services (EMS) utilization and response patterns associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency declaration and stay-at-home orders during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an uncontrolled interrupted time series analysis of EMS calls (January 1, 2019 - March 1, 2021) in Marin County, California analyzing call volume (All calls, n=46,055); patient refusal of EMS care or transport and patient care resolved on scene (Calls with opportunity for transport; n=37,401); and call severity (Transported calls; n=27,887). Pre-COVID-19 (1/1/2019-3/2/2020), EMS transported patients were predominately female (50.6%), 80+ years old (31.6%), and Marin County residents (68.0%). During COVID-19 (3/3/2020-3/1/2021), EMS transported patients were predominately male (52.7%), 35-64 years old (29.8%), and Marin County residents (70.4%). After the first stay-at-home order on 3/17/2020, call volume immediately decreased by 48% (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]=0.52; 95% CI=0.35,0.79) for children (0-15 years) and 34% for adults 80+ years (aIRR=0.66;95% CI=0.46,0.95). The odds of a transported call being prioritized as severe doubled (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.26; 95% CI=1.11,4.59). Though transport refusals increased by 69% for children after the first order (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.13-2.52]), immediately following the second order on 12/8/2020, transport refusals decreased by 30% for children but increased 38-40% for adults 35-79 years (aOR=1.40 [95% CI=1.04-1.89] for 35-64 years; 1.38 [95% CI=1.02-1.87] for 65-79 years). Calls resolved on scene by EMS increased after the first order among all ages and after the second order for adults 16-79 years. Call volume reduced for children and older adults after the first COVID-19 stay-at-home order. Changes in call severity, patient care refusals, and on-scene care provided by EMS indicated a changing role for EMS during the outbreak.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Willingness to consider alternatives to ambulance use among adult emergency department patientsThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020
- The Effect of Older Age on EMS Use for Transportation to an Emergency DepartmentPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2017
- Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency callsScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2015
- Prehospital Notification by Emergency Medical Services Reduces Delays in Stroke EvaluationStroke, 2011
- Effect Displays inRfor Multinomial and Proportional-Odds Logit Models: Extensions to theeffectsPackageJournal of Statistical Software, 2009
- Effect of the SARS outbreak on visits to a community hospital emergency departmentCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Medically Unnecessary Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Transports Among Children Ages 0 to 17 YearsMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2006
- Object-Oriented Computation of Sandwich EstimatorsJournal of Statistical Software, 2006
- Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix EstimatorsJournal of Statistical Software, 2004
- Studying seasonality by using sine and cosine functions in regression analysis.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999