Clinical Faceoff: One- Versus Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infections
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 471 (6) , 1750-1753
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With a High Rate of Infection Control but High MortalityClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of FailureClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty RegisterActa Orthopaedica, 2011
- Comparison of One and Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty Complicated by InfectionJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2011
- A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty?The Knee, 2011
- Two-stage Exchange Knee Arthroplasty: Does Resistance of the Infecting Organism Influence the Outcome?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Survival of the Cementless Spotorno® Stem in the Second DecadeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- The Morscher Press Fit acetabular componentThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2009
- Morphology of the Tibial Insertion of the Posterior Cruciate LigamentJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009
- Ten- to Twelve-Year Follow-Up of the Furlong Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stem and Threaded Acetabular Cup in Patients Younger Than 65 YearsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008