Comparing NISAR (Using Sentinel-1), USDA/NASS CDL, and Ground Truth Crop/Non-Crop Areas in an Urban Agricultural Region
Open Access
Abstract
A general limitation in assessing the accuracy of land cover mapping is the availability of ground truth data. At sites where ground truth is not available, potentially inaccurate proxy datasets are used for sub-field-scale resolution investigations at large spatial scales, i.e., in the Contiguous United States. The USDA/NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL) is a popular agricultural land cover dataset due to its high accuracy (>80%), resolution (30 m), and inclusions of many land cover and crop types. However, because the CDL is derived from satellite imagery and has resulting uncertainties, comparisons to available in situ data are necessary for verifying classification performance. This study compares the cropland mapping accuracies (crop/non-crop) of an optical approach (CDL) and the radar-based crop area (CA) approach used for the upcoming NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) L- and S-band mission but using Sentinel-1 C-band data. CDL and CA performance are compared to ground truth data that includes 54 agricultural production and research fields located at USDA’s Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) in Maryland, USA. We also evaluate non-crop mapping accuracy using twenty-six built-up and thirteen forest sites at BARC. The results show that the CDL and CA have a good pixel-wise agreement with one another (87%). However, the CA is notably more accurate compared to ground truth data than the CDL. The 2017–2021 mean accuracies for the CDL and CA, respectively, are 77% and 96% for crop, 100% and 94% for built-up, and 100% and 100% for forest, yielding an overall accuracy of 86% for the CDL and 96% for CA. This difference mainly stems from the CDL under-detecting crop cover at BARC, especially in 2017 and 2018. We also note that annual accuracy levels varied less for the CA (91–98%) than for the CDL (79–93%). This study demonstrates that a computationally inexpensive radar-based cropland mapping approach can also give accurate results over complex landscapes with accuracies similar to or better than optical approaches.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first centuryPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013
- CropScape: A Web service based application for exploring and disseminating US conterminous geospatial cropland data products for decision supportComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2012
- GMES Sentinel-1 missionRemote Sensing of Environment, 2012
- Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer ProgramGeocarto International, 2011
- Estimating Global Cropland Extent with Multi-year MODIS DataRemote Sensing, 2010
- Finding the right pixel sizeComputers & Geosciences, 2006
- Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycleNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2004
- Anthropogenic Disturbance of the Terrestrial Water CycleBioScience, 2000
- A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetryIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996
- Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneityIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1990