dMM-PBSA: A New HADDOCK Scoring Function for Protein-Peptide Docking
Open Access
- 31 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
- Vol. 3, 46
Abstract
Molecular-docking programs coupled with suitable scoring functions are now established and very useful tools enabling computational chemists to rapidly screen large chemical databases and thereby to identify promising candidate compounds for further experimental processing. In a broader scenario, predicting binding affinity is one of the most critical and challenging components of computer-aided structure-based drug design. The development of a molecular docking scoring function which in principle could combine both features, namely ranking putative poses and predicting complex affinity, would be of paramount importance. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of the MM-PBSA approach, using two different Poisson-Boltzmann solvers (APBS and DelPhi), in the currently rising field of protein-peptide interactions (PPIs), identifying the correct binding conformations of 19 different protein–peptide complexes and predicting their binding free energies. First, we scored the decoy structures from HADDOCK calculation via the MM-PBSA approach in order to assess the capability of retrieving near-native poses in the best-scoring clusters and of evaluating the corresponding free energies of binding. MM-PBSA behaves well in finding the poses corresponding to the lowest binding free energy, however the built-in HADDOCK score shows a better performance. In order to improve the MM-PBSA–based scoring function, we dampened the MM-PBSA solvation and coulombic terms by 0.2, as proposed in the HADDOCK score and LIE approaches. The new dampened MM-PBSA (dMM-PBSA) outperforms the original MM-PBSA and ranks the decoys structures as the HADDOCK score does. Second, we found a good correlation between the dMM-PBSA and HADDOCK scores for the near-native clusters of each system and the experimental binding energies, respectively. Therefore, we propose a new scoring function, dMM-PBSA, to be used together with the built-in HADDOCK score in the context of protein-peptide docking simulations.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- A general and Robust Ray-Casting-Based Algorithm for Triangulating Surfaces at the NanoscalePLOS ONE, 2013
- Virtual screening using molecular simulationsProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2011
- Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics SimulationsJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2010
- Absolute binding free energy calculations: On the accuracy of computational scoring of protein–ligand interactionsProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- Computational analysis of the cathepsin B inhibitors activities through LR‐MMPBSA binding affinity calculation based on docked complexJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2009
- The solution structure of the first PHD finger of autoimmune regulator in complex with non-modified histone H3 tail reveals the antagonistic role of H3R2 methylationNucleic Acids Research, 2009
- Rescoring Docking Hit Lists for Model Cavity Sites: Predictions and Experimental TestingJournal of Molecular Biology, 2008
- Rapid grid‐based construction of the molecular surface and the use of induced surface charge to calculate reaction field energies: Applications to the molecular systems and geometric objectsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2001
- Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosomeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- The Protein Data BankNucleic Acids Research, 2000