Carabid movement and vegetation density: Implications for interpreting pitfall trap data from split-field trials
Authors:
- C.F.G. ThomasCTC.F.G. Thomas
- N.J. BrownNBN.J. Brown
- D.A. KendallDKD.A. Kendall
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Vol. 113 (1-4) , 51-61
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant cropsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003
- Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant cropsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003
- Design, analysis and statistical power of the Farm‐Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide‐tolerant cropsJournal of Applied Ecology, 2003
- Laser marking the carabid Pterostichus melanarius for mark–release–recaptureEcological Entomology, 2001
- Modelling the dynamic spatio‐temporal response of predators to transient prey patches in the fieldEcology Letters, 2001
- Aggregation and temporal stability of carabid beetle distributions in field and hedgerow habitatsJournal of Applied Ecology, 2001
- The within-field spatial and temporal distribution of arthropods in winter wheatBulletin of Entomological Research, 1999
- Isolating the components of activity-density for the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in farmlandOecologia, 1998
- SAMPLING CARABID ASSEMBLAGES WITH PITFALL TRAPS: THE MADNESS AND THE METHODThe Canadian Entomologist, 1994
- Catches in pitfall traps in relation to mean densities of carabid beetlesOecologia, 1979