The good (logMAR), the bad (Snellen) and the ugly (BCVA, number of letters read) of visual acuity measurement
- 28 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Vol. 36 (4) , 355-358
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blindness and Visual Impairment in an Urban West African Population: The Tema Eye SurveyOphthalmology, 2012
- The effect of treatment zone diameter in hyperopic orthokeratologyOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2009
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Undercorrected Refractive Errors among Singaporean Malay Adults: The Singapore Malay Eye StudyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2009
- Is BCVA an invention of ophthalmology?Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 2008
- Visual Acuity as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials of Retinal DiseasesOphthalmology, 2007
- Visual Acuities “Hand Motion” and “Counting Fingers” Can Be Quantified with the Freiburg Visual Acuity TestInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2006
- Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young childrenOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2000
- SOME STATISTICAL CONCEPTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VISION AND VISUAL ACUITYOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1985
- Observer variation in ophthalmology.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1980
- New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter ChartsOptometry and Vision Science, 1976