Automated landslide detection outperforms manual mapping for several recent large earthquakes
Preprint
- 8 July 2021
- preprint
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
- Vol. 2021, 1-39
Abstract
Earthquakes in mountainous areas can trigger thousands of co-seismic landslides, causing significant damage, hampering relief efforts, and rapidly redistributing sediment across the landscape. Efforts to understand the controls on these landslides rely heavily on manually mapped landslide inventories, but these are costly and time-consuming to collect, and their reproducibility is not typically well constrained. Here we develop a new automated landslide detection algorithm (ALDI) based on pixel-wise NDVI differencing of Landsat time series within Google Earth Engine accounting for seasonality. We compare classified inventories to manually mapped inventories from five recent earthquakes: 2005 Kashmir, 2007 Aisen, 2008 Wenchuan, 2010 Haiti, and 2015 Gorkha. We test the ability of ALDI to recover landslide locations (using ROC curves) and landslide sizes (in terms of landslide area-frequency statistics). We find that ALDI more skilfully identifies landslides than published inventories in 10 of 14 cases when ALDI is locally optimised, and in 8 of 14 cases both when ALDI is globally optimised and in holdback testing. These results reflect both good performance of the automated approach but also surprisingly poor performance of manual mapping, which has implications not only for how future classifiers are tested but also for the interpretations that are based on these inventories. We conclude that ALDI already represents a viable alternative to manual mapping in terms of its ability to identify landslide-affected image pixels. Its fast run-time, cost-free image requirements and near-global coverage make it an attractive alternative with the potential to significantly improve the coverage and quantity of landslide inventories. Its simplicity (pixel-wise analysis only) and parsimony of inputs (optical imagery only) suggests that considerable further improvement should be possible.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22 (2), 481.
Funding Information
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N012216/1, NE/J01995X/1)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coseismic landslides triggered by the 2018 Hokkaido, Japan (Mw 6.6), earthquake: spatial distribution, controlling factors, and possible failure mechanismLandslides, 2019
- Using multiresolution and multitemporal satellite data for post-disaster landslide inventory in the Republic of SerbiaLandslides, 2017
- A seismologically consistent expression for the total area and volume of earthquake‐triggered landslidingJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2016
- Seismic mountain building: Landslides associated with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the context of a generalized model for earthquake volume balanceGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2014
- Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysisLandslides, 2013
- Landslides induced by the April 2007 Aysén Fjord earthquake, Chilean PatagoniaLandslides, 2010
- Global earthquake casualties due to secondary effects: a quantitative analysis for improving rapid loss analysesNatural Hazards, 2009
- Interpretation of landslide distribution triggered by the 2005 Northern Pakistan earthquake using SPOT 5 imageryLandslides, 2006
- Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult?Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2005
- The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty predictionHydrological Processes, 1992