Development of the First WHO Guidelines for Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Open Access
- 26 October 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Neurology
- Vol. 12
Abstract
The first WHO guidelines for risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia marked an important milestone in the field of dementia prevention. In this paper, we discuss the evidence reviewed as part of the guidelines development and present the main themes emerged from its synthesis, to inform future research and policies on dementia risk reduction. The role of intervention effect-size; the mismatch between observational and intervention-based evidence; the heterogeneity of evidence among intervention trials; the importance of intervention duration; the role of timing of exposure to a certain risk factor and interventions; the relationship between intervention intensity and response; the link between individual risk factors and specific dementia pathologies; and the need for tailored interventions emerged as the main themes. The interaction and clustering of individual risk factors, including genetics, was identified as the overarching theme. The evidence collected indicates that multidomain approaches targeting simultaneously multiple risk factors and tailored at both individual and population level, are likely to be most effective and feasible in dementia risk reduction. The current status of multidomain intervention trials aimed to cognitive impairment/dementia prevention was also briefly reviewed. Primary results were presented focusing on methodological differences and the potential of design harmonization for improving evidence quality. Since multidomain intervention trials address a condition with slow clinical manifestation—like dementia—in a relatively short time frame, the need for surrogate outcomes was also discussed, with a specific focus on the potential utility of dementia risk scores. Finally, we considered how multidomain intervention could be most effectively implemented in a public health context and the implications world-wide for other non-communicable diseases targeting common risk factors, taking into account the limited evidence in low-middle income countries. In conclusion, the evidence from the first WHO guidelines for risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia indicated that “one size does not fit all,” and multidomain approaches adaptable to different populations and individuals are likely to be the most effective. Harmonization in trial design, the use of appropriate outcome measures, and sustainability in large at-risk populations in the context of other chronic disorders also emerged as key elements.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of statin use with risk of dementia: A meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studiesGeriatrics & Gerontology International, 2013
- Lifestyle modification programmes for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2012
- The effects of multi-domain versus single-domain cognitive training in non-demented older people: a randomized controlled trialBMC Medicine, 2012
- The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based MedicinePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population‐based studyJournal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Change in Depressive Symptoms During the Prodromal Phase of Alzheimer DiseaseArchives of General Psychiatry, 2008
- Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older personsNeurology, 2007
- Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2007
- Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practiceInternational Journal of Obesity, 2005