Does domain matter? Monitoring accuracy across domains
- 17 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Metacognition and Learning
- Vol. 14 (3) , 413-436
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2013-1359.)
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ending on a high note: Adding a better end to effortful study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
- Individual Differences in Absolute and Relative Metacomprehension Accuracy.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005
- The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depthCognitive Science, 2002
- Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect.Psychological Review, 2000
- Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You AskOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- The domain specificity and generality of overconfidence: Individual differences in performance estimation biasPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997
- General Knowledge Overconfidence: Cross-National Variations, Response Style, and “Reality”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Components of probability judgment accuracy: Individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment methodOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- Inexpert calibration of comprehensionMemory & Cognition, 1987
- Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977