Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance
Authors:
- Yolanda GilYGYolanda Gil
- Cédric H. DavidCDCédric H. David
- Ibrahim DemirIbrahim Demir
- Bakinam T. EssawyBEBakinam T. Essawy
- Robinson W. FulweilerRFRobinson W. Fulweiler
- Jonathan L. GoodallJGJonathan L. Goodall
- Leif KarlstromLKLeif Karlstrom
- Huikyo LeeHLHuikyo Lee
- Heath J. MillsHMHeath J. Mills
- Ji‐Hyun OhJOJi‐Hyun Oh
- Suzanne A. PierceSPSuzanne A. Pierce
- Allen PopeAPAllen Pope
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 July 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Earth and Space Science
- Vol. 3 (10) , 388-415
Abstract
Geoscientists now live in a world rich with digital data and methods, and their computational research cannot be fully captured in traditional publications. The Geoscience Paper of the Future (GPF) presents an approach to fully document, share, and cite all their research products including data, software, and computational provenance. This article proposes best practices for GPF authors to make data, software, and methods openly accessible, citable, and well documented. The publication of digital objects empowers scientists to manage their research products as valuable scientific assets in an open and transparent way that enables broader access by other scientists, students, decision makers, and the public. Improving documentation and dissemination of research will accelerate the pace of scientific discovery by improving the ability of others to build upon published work.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (0940841, CBET‐1204841, 1336839, IIA‐1301765)
- U.S. Geological Survey (G12PC00066)
This publication has 113 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying Reproducibility in Computational Biology: The Case of the Tuberculosis DrugomePLOS ONE, 2013
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer researchNature, 2012
- Retracted Science and the Retraction IndexInfection and Immunity, 2011
- What Do I Want from the Publisher of the Future?PLOS Computational Biology, 2010
- Public sharing of research datasets: A pilot study of associationsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- Transparency and reproducibility in data analysis: the Prostate Cancer Prevention TrialBiostatistics, 2010
- Accessible Reproducible ResearchScience, 2010
- A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomicsNature Methods, 2009
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLOS Medicine, 2005
- The What and Whys of DOIsPLOS Biology, 2003