Changes in Alcohol Use among Adults with Cancer Participating in the ECOG-ACRIN EAQ171CD Tobacco Treatment Trial
Authors:
- Angela Wangari WalterAWAngela Wangari Walter
- JoRean D. SicksJSJoRean D. Sicks
- Alexander TauroneATAlexander Taurone
- Sai Priyanka MellacheruvuSMSai Priyanka Mellacheruvu
- Rachel L. RosenRRRachel L. Rosen
- Brett M. GosheBGBrett M. Goshe
- Ilana F. GareenIGIlana F. Gareen
- Benjamin A. HermanBHBenjamin A. Herman
- Autumn W. RasmussenARAutumn W. Rasmussen
- Alona MuzikanskyAMAlona Muzikansky
- Susan ReganSRSusan Regan
- Douglas E. LevyDLDouglas E. Levy
- 9 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 35 (11) , 1897-1905
Abstract
Background: Alcohol and tobacco use are known carcinogens. Treating alcohol and tobacco co-use can improve treatment and survivorship outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of ECOG-ACRIN EAQ171CD trial participants within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), examining changes in alcohol use among adults receiving the virtual sustained treatment (VST) for tobacco use intervention versus enhanced usual care (EUC; Quitline referral). Multivariable logistic regression assessed changes in alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk at 3 and 6 months using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Concise (AUDIT-C). Results: At baseline, participants (N = 305) were classified as having no risk (31%), low/minimal risk (38%), moderate risk (23%), or high risk (8%) for AUD. The mean age was 55.6 years, participants smoked for an average of 33 years, and 18% had alcohol-associated tumors. Participants randomized to EUC were more likely to shift to a lower alcohol risk category than those in the VST arm at 3 months (39% vs. 27%) and 6 months (33% vs. 27%). There was no significant difference in the odds of shifting to a lower risk category for VST versus EUC at 3 months [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26–1.18; P = 0.125] or at 6 months (adjusted OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.25–1.28; P = 0.172). Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with cancer and engaging in alcohol and tobacco co-use can achieve reductions in alcohol use and risk. Impact: Integrating tailored, co-use–focused strategies into cessation programs may improve changes in modifiable risk behaviors.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA214427)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing Alcohol Use to Prevent Cancer Deaths: Estimated Effects Among U.S. AdultsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2024
- Routine Assessment of Symptoms of Substance Use Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence and Severity of Reported SymptomsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2020
- Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Adolescents and AdultsJAMA, 2018
- Change in alcohol and tobacco consumption after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer: Findings from Head and Neck 5000Head & Neck, 2018
- Post‐diagnosis alcohol intake and prostate cancer survival: A population‐based cohort studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2018
- Substance use disorder and its effects on outcomes in men with advanced‐stage prostate cancerCancer, 2014
- Influence of the persistence of tobacco and alcohol use in the appearance of second neoplasm in patients with a head and neck cancer. A case–control studyCancer Causes & Control, 2008
- Alcohol Abuse Predicts Progression of Disease and Death in Patients with Lung CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Two Brief Alcohol-Screening Tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2003
- The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C)An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem DrinkingArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998