Shared resources, shared costs—leveraging biocuration resources
Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- dataset
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
- Vol. 2015
Abstract
The manual curation of the information in biomedical resources is an expensive task. This article argues the value of this approach in comparison with other apparently less costly options, such as automated annotation or text-mining, then discusses ways in which databases can make cost savings by sharing infrastructure and tool development. Sharing curation effort is a model already being adopted by several data resources. Approaches taken by two of these, the Gene Ontology annotation effort and the IntAct molecular interaction database, are reviewed in more detail. These models help to ensure long-term persistence of curated data and minimizes redundant development of resources by multiple disparate groups. Database URL:http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact and http://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The International Nucleotide Sequence Database CollaborationNucleic Acids Research, 2012
- Gene Ontology Annotations and ResourcesNucleic Acids Research, 2012
- MuMoD: a Bayesian approach to detect multiple modes of protein–DNA binding from genome-wide ChIP dataNucleic Acids Research, 2012
- An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genomeNature, 2012
- The future of the protein data bankBiopolymers, 2012
- PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactionsNature Methods, 2011
- UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein dataDatabase: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2011
- A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencingNature, 2010
- The GOA database in 2009--an integrated Gene Ontology Annotation resourceNucleic Acids Research, 2009
- MPIDB: the microbial protein interaction databaseBioinformatics, 2008