Evaluating Worldwide Disparities in Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Availability
Authors:
- Koral U. ShahKSKoral U. Shah
- Daniela V. CastroDCDaniela V. Castro
- Xiaochen LiXLXiaochen Li
- Miguel ZugmanMZMiguel Zugman
- Salvador Jaime-CasasSJSalvador Jaime-Casas
- Vitor Abreu de GoesVGVitor Abreu de Goes
- Peter D. ZangPZPeter D. Zang
- Skylar ReidSRSkylar Reid
- Teebro PaulTPTeebro Paul
- Jaya GoudJGJaya Goud
- Samuel DickterSDSamuel Dickter
- Lea DickterLDLea Dickter
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer disproportionately affects non-high-income countries, yet clinical trials underrepresent global diversity. We assessed global availability of bladder cancer trials, their alignment with disease burden, and barriers to equitable care. Methods: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov for adult bladder cancer trials from June 2019 to June 2024, excluding observational and non-oncologic trials. Trial characteristics were summarized descriptively, and country data came from the Global Cancer Observatory. Countries were classified per World Bank Ranking (WBR) into high-income (HICs), upper middle-income (UMICs), lower middle-income (LMICs), and low-income countries (LICs). Trials were categorized as HIC-only, non-HIC, or mixed-income trials. Fisher’s exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests compared groups. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between trial availability and WBR, national health expenditure, and gross national income (GNI). Univariable linear regression and ANOVA assessed the association between the mortality-to-incident ratio and WBR. Results: Of 611 trials, 75.1% were HIC-only, 16.9% non-HIC, and 8.0% mixed-income trials. Non-HIC trials were mainly academic-sponsored (80.6%), while all mixed-income trials had pharmaceutical sponsorship (p < 0.001). Non-HIC trials had lower enrollment, less pharmaceutical funding, fewer multinational collaborations, and fewer basket, multi-arm, early-phase designs (all p < 0.001). Mixed-income trials were larger, led by HICs, had broader eligibility criteria, more novel therapies, and more frequent use of overall survival endpoints. Trial availability was lower in UMICs (p = 0.011), LMICs (p = 0.024), and absent in LICs, and positively associated with higher national health expenditure (p = 0.007) and GNI (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Bladder cancer trials remain concentrated in HICs. Mixed-income trials expand access in non-high-income countries, but are exclusively led by HICs and require balanced sponsorship, early-phase research, and lasting local benefits.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Financial Burden of Localized and Metastatic Bladder CancerEuropean Urology, 2024
- Global inequalities in availability of systemic therapies for cancer care and strategies to address themJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2023
- Estimates and Projections of the Global Economic Cost of 29 Cancers in 204 Countries and Territories From 2020 to 2050JAMA Oncology, 2023
- Participation of Lower and Upper Middle–Income Countries in Oncology Clinical Trials Led by High-Income CountriesJAMA Network Open, 2022
- An Analysis of Contemporary Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials From Low/Middle-Income vs High-Income CountriesJAMA Oncology, 2021
- Challenges facing the urologist in low- and middle-income countriesWorld Journal of Urology, 2020
- Estimation of Study Time Reduction Using Surrogate End Points Rather Than Overall Survival in Oncology Clinical TrialsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2019
- A systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses measuring the strength of association between surrogate end-points and overall survival in oncologyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2019
- Pathological characteristics and prognostic indicators of different histopathological types of urinary bladder cancer following radical cystectomy in a large single-center Egyptian cohortWorld Journal of Urology, 2018
- The Strength of Association Between Surrogate End Points and Survival in OncologyJAMA Internal Medicine, 2015