COVID-19: Contrasting experiences of South African physiotherapists based on patient exposure
Open Access
- 11 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AOSIS in South African Journal of Physiotherapy
- Vol. 78 (1) , 8
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exposed physiotherapists to unique work-related challenges. However, there is a lack of research regarding the mental health and lived experiences of South African physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.Objectives: To determine levels of mental and physical health, burnout, depression, anxiety and resilience and coping strategies used by a sample of South African physiotherapists with and without exposure to patients with COVID-19. Lived work experience, perceived health and sources of support were also explored.Method: A non-experimental, cross-sectional, mixed-method design was used. Physiotherapists completed an online survey comprising: a demographic questionnaire; scales assessing mental and physical health, burnout, depression, anxiety and coping strategies and six open-ended questions. A total of 171 physiotherapists participated in our study, 43.3% of whom were exposed to patients with COVID-19.Results: The exposure group scored significantly higher on self-reported mental health, anxiety, depression and burnout than the non-exposure group. No significant differences were reported for physical health and resilience. Significantly more maladaptive coping strategies were employed by the exposure group. Participants’ lived experiences highlighted similar experiences, as well as work-related challenges. Both groups reported that primary sources of support were significant others, but highlighted the lack of organisational support.Conclusion: Irrespective of the degree of exposure to COVID-19, the mental health and lived experiences of physiotherapists working in South Africa has been negatively impacted by COVID-19.Clinical implications: Understanding physiotherapists’ well-being and lived experiences during the pandemic may guide workplace interventions. Our findings suggest the need for psycho-educational intervention programmes to be implemented at an organisational level.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-item PROMIS® global physical and mental health scalesJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2017
- Feasibility and acceptability of electronic symptom surveillance with clinician feedback using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in Danish prostate cancer patientsJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2017
- More adaptive versus less maladaptive coping: What is more predictive of symptom severity? Development of a new scale to investigate coping profiles across different psychopathological syndromesJournal of Affective Disorders, 2016
- The health and health system of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challengesThe Lancet, 2009
- An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trialsPsychiatry Research, 2007
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)Depression and Anxiety, 2003
- The Hospital Anxiety And Depression ScaleHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003
- The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2002
- You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief copeInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1997