Interpretable vs. noninterpretable machine learning models for data-driven hydro-climatological process modeling
Authors:
- Debaditya ChakrabortyDCDebaditya Chakraborty
- Hakan BaşağaoğluHakan Başağaoğlu
- James WinterleJWJames Winterle
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Expert Systems with Applications
- Vol. 170
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multimodel‐based analyses of evapotranspiration and its controls in China over the last three decadesEcohydrology, 2020
- Trends in evapotranspiration and their responses to climate change and vegetation greening over the upper reaches of the Yellow River BasinAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018
- The Mythos of Model InterpretabilityQueue, 2018
- Evaluation of random forests and generalized regression neural networks for daily reference evapotranspiration modellingAgricultural Water Management, 2017
- Multimodel assessment of sensitivity and uncertainty of evapotranspiration and a proxy for available water resources under climate changeClimatic Change, 2017
- Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate variablesComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017
- Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration equations modelling by extreme learning machineComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016
- Support vector machine applications in the field of hydrology: A reviewApplied Soft Computing, 2014
- Random ForestsMachine Learning, 2001
- Long Short-Term MemoryNeural Computation, 1997