Integrated Mental Health Services for the Developmental Period (0 to 25 Years): A Critical Review of the Evidence
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 June 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Vol. 10, 355
Abstract
Background: The developmental period from 0 to 25 years is a vulnerable time during which children and young people experience many psychosocial and neurobiological changes and an increased incidence of mental illness. New clinical services for children and young people aged 0 to 25 years may represent a radical transformation of mental healthcare. Method: Critical, non-systematic review of the PubMed literature up to 3rd January 2019. Results: Rationale: the youngest age group has an increased risk of developing mental disorders and 75% of mental disorders begin by the age of 24 and prodromal features may start even earlier. Most of the risk factors for mental disorders exert their role before the age of 25, profound maturational brain changes occur from mid-childhood through puberty to the mid-20s, and mental disorders that persist in adulthood have poor long-term outcomes. The optimal window of opportunity to improve the outcomes of mental disorders is the prevention or early treatment in individuals aged 0 to 25 within a clinical staging model framework. Unmet needs: children and young people face barriers to primary and secondary care access, delays in receiving appropriate treatments, poor engagement, cracks between child and adult mental health services, poor involvement in the design of mental health services, and lack of evidence-based treatments. Evidence: the most established paradigm for reforming youth mental services focuses on people aged 12–25 who experienced early stages of psychosis. Future advancements may include early stages of depression and bipolar disorders. Broader youth mental health services have been implemented worldwide, but no single example constitutes best practice. These services seem to improve access, symptomatic and functional outcomes, and satisfaction of children and young people aged 12–25. However, there are no robust controlled trials demonstrating their impact. Very limited evidence is available for integrated mental health services that focus on people aged 0–12. Conclusions: Children and young people aged 12–25 need youth-friendly mental health services that are sensitive to their unique stage of clinical, neurobiological, and psychosocial development. Early intervention for psychosis services may represent the starting platform to refine the next generation of integrated youth mental health services.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating differential developmental trajectories to adolescent-onset mood and psychotic disordersBMC Psychiatry, 2013
- ‘Talking a different language’: an exploration of the influence of organizational cultures and working practices on transition from child to adult mental health servicesBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Outreach and support in South London (OASIS), 2001–2011: Ten years of early diagnosis and treatment for young individuals at high clinical risk for psychosisEuropean Psychiatry, 2013
- From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development GoalsThe Lancet, 2012
- Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysisThe Lancet, 2011
- Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008
- Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literatureCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry, 2007
- Clinical Staging of Psychiatric Disorders: A Heuristic Framework for Choosing Earlier, Safer and more Effective InterventionsAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey ReplicationArchives of General Psychiatry, 2005
- Staging: a neglected dimension in psychiatric classificationActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1993