Growth options and firm valuation
- 17 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Financial Management
- Vol. 24 (2) , 209-238
Abstract
This paper studies the relationship between firm value and a firm's growth options. We find strong empirical evidence that Tobin's Q increases with firm‐level volatility. The significance mainly comes from R&D firms, which have more growth options than non‐R&D firms. By decomposing firm‐level volatility into its systematic and unsystematic part, we document that only idiosyncratic volatility has a significant effect on valuation. Second, we analyze the relation of stock returns to realized contemporaneous idiosyncratic volatility and R&D expenses. Sorting on idiosyncratic volatility yields a significant negative relationship between portfolio alphas and contemporaneous idiosyncratic volatility for non‐R&D portfolios.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expected Idiosyncratic Volatility Measures and Expected ReturnsFinancial Management, 2012
- Real Options, Volatility, and Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2012
- Options trading activity and firm valuationJournal of Financial Economics, 2009
- Real Options, Product Market Competition, and Asset ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2009
- Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing ApproachesThe Review of Financial Studies, 2008
- Can Growth Options Explain the Trend in Idiosyncratic Risk?The Review of Financial Studies, 2006
- Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin's qR&D Management, 2005
- Optimal Investment, Growth Options, and Security ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel DataReview of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- The Value of Waiting to InvestThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986