Heterotopic Ossification in Total Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement
Authors:
- Christoph MehrenCMChristoph Mehren
- Petr SuchomelPSPetr Suchomel
- Frank GrochullaFGFrank Grochulla
- Pavel BarsaPBPavel Barsa
- Petra SourkovaPSPetra Sourkova
- Jan HradilJHJan Hradil
- Andreas KorgeAKAndreas Korge
- H Michael MayerHMH Michael Mayer
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 31 (24) , 2802-2806
Abstract
Prospective clinical study enrolled in 2 centers (Munich and Liberec) as part of a prospective European multicenter study with ProDisc C (Synthes Inc., Paoli, PA). The first goal of the study was to evaluate the rate of heterotopic ossifications identified with plain radiograph following total cervical disc replacement (TCDR). The second goal was to show whether segmental motion can be preserved, and whether TCDR can provide improvement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living as well as a decrease of pain. Only a few reports about the radiologic outcome after TCDR are published so far. Heterotopic ossification is a well-known phenomenon after total hip arthroplasty. The rate of heterotopic ossification following TCDR is unclear. The radiographs of 54 patients (in total, 77 implanted prostheses) were analyzed 1 year after TCDR with a ProDisc C prosthesis. We classified the heterotopic ossification in 5 grades according to a recently published classification system for lumbar total disc replacement. For clinical parameters, the visual analog scale and the Neck Disability Index were evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The Student t test and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis. In 26 treated segments (33.8%), no heterotopic ossification was detectable. Grade 1 ossifications were present in 6 levels (7.8%). A total of 30 segments (39.0%) showed grade 2 ossifications. Heterotopic ossifications that led to restrictions of the range of motion were present in 8 cases (10.4%). One year postoperatively, 7 cases (9.1%) had a spontaneous fusion of the treated segment. The clinical parameters improved significantly and were similar to previous reports about TCDR. Only 33.8% of the patients did not show any signs of heterotopic ossification, and the rate of spontaneous fusion after TCDR 1 year after surgery was unexpectedly high. There were 49.4% of the patients with grade 2-3 ossification, which lets us suspect an even higher rate of spontaneous fusion after long-term follow-ups. Motion preservation after TCDR is only guaranteed if spontaneous fusion can be prevented. Thus, mobility of the implanted segments needs to be further studied.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cervical Total Disc Replacement, Part Two: Clinical ResultsOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2005
- Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experienceJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2005
- Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) discThe Spine Journal, 2004
- Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trialNeurosurgical Focus, 2004
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograftThe Spine Journal, 2004
- Intermediate Follow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-Level and Bi-LevelSpine, 2003
- ProDisc Artificial Total Lumbar Disc Replacement: Introduction and Early Results From the United States Clinical TrialSpine, 2003
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Disc DiseaseAORN Journal, 2002
- Bone grafting, implants, and plating options for anterior cervical fusionsOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2002
- Anterior Cervical Fusion and Caspar Plate Stabilization for Cervical TraumaNeurosurgery, 1989