Asymmetrical Property of the Subproportionality of Weighting Function in Prospect Theory: Is It Real and How Can It Be Achieved?
Open Access
Abstract
An asymmetrical property of the probability weighting function, namely, subproportionality, was derived from observations. Subproportionality can provide a reasonable explanation for accommodating the Allais paradox and, therefore, deserves replication for its high impact. The present study aimed to explore the mechanism of subproportionality by comparing the two completely opposite decision mechanisms: prospect theory and equate-to-differentiate theory. Results revealed that the underlying mechanism supports the prediction of equate-to-differentiate theory but not prospect theory in the diagnostic stimuli condition. Knowledge regarding which intra-dimensional difference between Options A and B is greater, not knowledge regarding which option’s overall prospect value is greater, indeed predicts option preference. Our findings may deepen current understanding on the mechanisms behind the simple risky choice with a single-non-zero outcome. Additionally, these findings will hopefully encourage subsequent researchers to take a fresh look at the Allais paradox.Keywords
Funding Information
- The National Natural Science Foundation of China (71761167001)
- the Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (19ZDA358)
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and AssessmentJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2013
- Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated EffectPsychological Science, 2007
- The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs.Psychological Review, 2006
- An Alternative Way of Seeing the Allais‐Type Violations of the Sure‐Thing PrincipleHumanomics, 2004
- What Folklore Tells Us about Risk and Risk Taking: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of American, German, and Chinese ProverbsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined?Journal of Economic Psychology, 1998
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomaliesJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1994
- Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than othersMemory & Cognition, 1993
- Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.Psychological Review, 1988