An analysis reveals differences between pragmatic and explanatory diagnostic accuracy studies
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 117, 29-35
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (676207)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy: The Clinical Utility of Diagnostic TestsClinical Chemistry, 2012
- Quantifying the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Test or MarkerClinical Chemistry, 2012
- Target practice: choosing target conditions for test accuracy studies that are relevant to clinical practiceBMJ, 2011
- Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical TestsMedical Decision Making, 2009
- Explanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutical TrialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- What kind of randomized trials do we need?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature surveyBMJ, 2006
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic proceduresBMJ, 2002
- Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficientThe Lancet, 2000
- Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967