Dismemberment and Suffocation
Authors:
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 35 (10) , 1093-1118
Abstract
Do African countries suffer from their arbitrary boundaries? The authors test several hypotheses from the debate on this question. They differentiate, one by one, the degree of arbitrariness of African boundaries along two axes: the extent to which they partition preexisting political groupings (dismemberment) and the degree to which they bring together distinct precolonial political cultures (suffocation). They find that dismemberment is positively associated with international disputes and that suffocation magnifies the likelihood of civil wars, political instability, and secession attempts. The evidence appears to support claims that Africa has paid a substantial price for refusing to challenge some of the arbitrary boundaries it inherited from colonialism. The authors discuss the policy implications of their findings.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secession, states and international societyReview of International Studies, 1999
- Democracy, War Initiation, and VictoryAmerican Political Science Review, 1998
- Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic DivisionsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- Cultural Diversity and Economic Development: A Cross‐National Study of 98 Countries, 1960–1985Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1997
- The Impossible Necessity of Nigeria: A Struggle for NationhoodForeign Affairs, 1996
- War and the State in AfricaInternational Security, 1990
- The creation and matintenance of national boundaries in AfricaInternational Organization, 1989
- The Scramble for Africa: Inherited Political BoundariesThe Geographical Journal, 1986
- African Boundary Conflict: An Empirical StudyAfrican Studies Review, 1979
- The Background of the Ethio-Somalian Boundary DisputeThe Journal of Modern African Studies, 1964