Alarm calls of a cooperative bird are referential and elicit context-specific antipredator behavior
- 21 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Behavioral Ecology
- Vol. 28 (3) , 724-731
Abstract
Although functionally referential signals have been extensively studied, largely in mammals (e.g., nonhuman primates, see Cheney and Seyfarth (1988); mongooses, see Manser et al. (2002); and other ground-dwelling species, see Blumstein and Armitage (1997), other social taxa such as birds would similarly benefit from the use of referential signals. We therefore investigated alarm calling in the cooperative noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala), a species that has been anecdotally recorded producing aerial alarms to flying predators and empirically recorded generating terrestrial alarms to ground-based threats. For these signals to be truly referential however, they must meet 3 criteria. First, calls must be structurally distinct, a requirement that these 2 call types meet. Second, calls must be stimulus-specific and reliably associated with a given stimulus. We tested this on free-living birds by exposing them to a simulated aerial predator that was either in flight or subsequently perched and thus presented one of the first studies on functionally referential alarm systems where both aerial and terrestrial alarm calls have been tested. Miners only produced aerial alarms while the stimulus was in flight, switching to terrestrial alarms once it landed. Third, referential signals must elicit different escape responses that are “appropriate” to the associated threat. Under field conditions, aerial alarm playback alone provoked an almost instantaneous response of fleeing to vegetation cover, whereas terrestrial alarm playback elicited significantly slower responses by receivers and an increase in scanning behavior. During laboratory experiments, aerial alarms stimulated birds to spend more time looking upwards, whereas terrestrial alarm calls stimulated individuals to scan perpendicularly, as expected if these stimuli provided information on likely predator location. Although other avian taxa have been shown to use referential alarm signals, this system provides novel evidence of referential calls based on the behavior rather than the type of predator, providing a highly adaptive means of communicating risk to other members of the social group in this cooperative species.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Una revisión crítica de la hipótesis del cerebro social de DunbarRevista Internacional de Sociologia, 2016
- Fragmentation in eucalypt woodlands promotes nest‐tree occupancy by a despotic species, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala)Austral Ecology, 2016
- Mother knows best: functionally referential alarm calling in white-tailed ptarmiganAnimal Cognition, 2013
- Food calling in ravens: are yells referential signals?Animal Behaviour, 2001
- Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally variable alarm callsAnimal Behaviour, 1997
- Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primatesJournal of Human Evolution, 1992
- Noisy Miners: variations on the theme of communality1990
- Assessment of meaning and the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeysAnimal Behaviour, 1988
- How vervet monkeys perceive their grunts: Field playback experimentsAnimal Behaviour, 1982
- Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling MethodsBehaviour, 1974