Long-Term Outcome of the Randomized DAPA Trial
Authors:
- Arif ElvanAEArif Elvan
- Anand R. Ramdat MisierAMAnand R. Ramdat Misier
- Freek W.A. VerheugtFVFreek W.A. Verheugt
- M.J. SchalijMSM.J. Schalij
- F. ZijlstraFZF. Zijlstra
- 1 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
- Vol. 13 (11) , e008484
Abstract
Background - The randomized Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty (DAPA) trial aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in early selected high-risk patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods - A randomized, multicenter, controlled trial compared ICD versus conventional medical therapy in high risk primary PCI patients, based on one of the following factors: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% within 4 days after STEMI, primary ventricular fibrillation, Killip class ≥2 and/or TIMI flow < 3 after PCI. ICD was implanted 30-60 days after MI. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years follow-up. The trial prematurely ended after inclusion of 266 patients (38% of the calculated sample size). Additional survival assessment was performed in February 2019 for the primary endpoint. Results - A total of 266 patients, 78.2% males, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 11.3 years, were enrolled. 131 patients were randomized to the ICD arm and 135 patients to the control arm. All-cause mortality was significant lower in the ICD group (5% vs 13%, HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.15-0.95) after 3 years follow-up. Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 9 patients at 3 years follow-up (5 within the first 8 months after implantation). After median long-term follow-up of 9 years (IQR, 3-11), total mortality (18% vs 38%, HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.91) and cardiac mortality (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28-0.99) was significant lower in the ICD group. Non-cardiac death was not significantly different between groups. LVEF increased ≥10% in 46.5% of the patients during follow up and the extent of improvement was similar in both study groups. Conclusions - In this prematurely terminated and thus underpowered randomized trial, early prophylactic ICD implantation demonstrated lower total and cardiac mortality in high-risk STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac deathEuropean Heart Journal, 2015
- Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Outcomes of Early Risk Stratification and Targeted Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2009
- Prognostic Importance of Defibrillator Shocks in Patients with Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Implantable defibrillator early after primary percutaneous intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty (DAPA) TrialAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Sudden Death in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Heart Failure, or BothNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Prophylactic Use of an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection FractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)—executive summary21When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Smith SC, Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes D, Kern MJ, Kuntz RE, Popma JJ, Schaff HV, Williams DO. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2215–38.22Address for reprints: a single reprint of this document is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. This document (reprint no. 71-0205), as well as the companion full-text guideline (reprint no. 71-0206), are available on the ACC Web site at www.acc.organd the AHA Web site at http://www.americanheart.org. To purchase additional reprints (specify version): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342; or E-mail: pubauth@heart.org.JACC, 2001