Calcium intake in the elderly: validation of a dietary questionnaire
Authors:
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Vol. 1 (2) , 115-127
Abstract
Epidemiological studies of calcium and osteoporosis have been hampered by the lack of a suitable tool for assessing calcium intake. This report describes a new frequency and amount questionnaire for measuring present and past calcium intake in the elderly. The validity of the questionnaire was tested against two commonly used standards of dietary assessment, five‐day duplicate diets and seven‐day weighed dietary inventories. The resulting correlation coefficients were, respectively, r= 0.76 and r= 0.69, while that for repeatability was r= 0.84. Furthermore, the questionnaire categorized subjects into thirds of the distribution of intake with almost no gross misclassification. It is suggested that the present findings may be extended to the majority of normal, healthy elderly subjects, implying wide application for the questionnaire in the assessment of calcium intake in the elderly.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The uptake and excretion of chromium by the elderlyThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1984
- THE INCREASING INCIDENCE OF FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR: AN ORTHOPAEDIC EPIDEMICThe Lancet, 1983
- Dietary history from the distant past: A methodological studyNutrition and Cancer, 1983
- Calcium nutrition and bone health in the elderlyThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- Fractured Neck of Femur in the Elderly: An Attempt to Identify Patients at RiskClinical Science, 1979
- Bone status and fracture rates in two regions of YugoslaviaThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1979
- Individual Dietary Surveys: Purposes and Methods1971
- Calcium Deficiency and OsteoporosisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1967
- Concurrent Axial and Appendicular OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1965