Reliability of the imaging software in the preoperative planning of the open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy
Authors:
- 12 October 2013
- journal article
- knee
- Published by Wiley in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Vol. 23 (3) , 846-851
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify a recently developed picture‐archiving and communications system‐photoshop method by comparing reliabilities between real‐size paper template and the PACS‐photoshop methods in preoperative planning of open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy.Methods: A prospective case series was conducted, including patients with medial osteoarthritis undergoing open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy. In the preoperative planning, the picture‐archiving and communications system‐photoshop method and real‐size paper template method were used simultaneously in all patients. Preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle, height, and angle of the osteotomy were evaluated. The reliability of this newly devised method was evaluated, and the consistency between the two methods was also evaluated using intra‐class correlation coefficient.Results: Using the picture‐archiving and communications system‐photoshop method, the mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater‐1 were 11.7° ± 3.6° and 10.7 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. The mean correction angle and height of osteotomy gap of rater‐2 were 12.0 ± 2.6 and 10.8 ± 3.6, respectively. The inter‐ and intra‐rater reliabilities of the correction angle were 0.956 ~ 0.979 and 0.980 ~ 0.992, respectively. The inter‐ and intra‐rater reliabilities of the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.968 ~ 0.985 and 0.971 ~ 0.994, respectively (p < 0.001). Using the real‐size paper template method, the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.5° ± 3.4° and 10.9 ± 3.8 mm, respectively. Using the picture‐archiving and communications system‐photoshop method, mean values of the correction angle and height of the osteotomy gap were 11.9° ± 3.6° and 10.8 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. Consistency between the two methods by comparing the means of the correction angle and the height of the osteotomy gap were 0.985 and 0.985, respectively (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Use of the picture‐archiving and communications system‐photoshop method enables direct measurement of the height of the osteotomy gap with high reliability.Level of evidence: III.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preoperative and Postoperative Comparisons of Navigation and Radiologic Limb Alignment Measurements After High Tibial OsteotomyArthroscopy, 2012
- High Complication Rate After Biplanar Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Stabilized With a New Spacer Plate (Position HTO Plate) Without Bone SubstituteArthroscopy, 2011
- Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2010
- Reliability of lower limb alignment measures using an established landmark-based method with a customized computer software programRheumatology International, 2009
- The effect of closed- and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slopeThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- Navigation versus Radiographic Measurements in the Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy using Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS)Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association, 2008
- Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia – early results in 92 casesInjury, 2003
- Preoperative Planning for High Tibial OsteotomyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992
- Proximal Tibial OsteotomyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989