Hypospadias repair: the two‐stage alternative
Author:
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 76 (6) , 31-41
Abstract
Summary: One‐stage repairs for hypospadias are attractive in concept and are currently in vogue, but many surgeons remain unhappy with their inherent limitations and drawbacks. Two‐stage repair, reconstructing the new urethra with a full‐thickness skin graft, offers a realistic alternative and the method described here can be applied to almost any degree of deformity, be it a simple primary case or salvage of a multi‐operated and skin‐deficient hypospadias ‘cripple’. From a personal series of over 600 cases the author concludes that a two‐stage operation is an acceptable price to pay for a repair that offers unique versatility, excellent reliability and a sophistication of function and aesthetics thatis hard to achieve with one‐stage methods.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A long-term view of hypospadiasBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1989
- Experience with a Modification of the Cloutier Technique for Hypospadias RepairJournal of Urology, 1988
- Micturition Studies and Sexual Function in Operated HypospadiacsBritish Journal of Urology, 1983
- Timing of Elective Hypospadias Repair in ChildrenPediatrics, 1983
- Observations Upon Techniques for Reconstruction of the Urethral Meatus, the Hypospadiac Glans Deformity, and the Penile UrethraUrologic Clinics of North America, 1979
- Improved repairs in 100 cases of penile hypospadiasBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1976
- A long-term follow-up of hypospadias patientsBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1975
- Aftereffects of Hypospadias Repair in ChildhoodPostgraduate Medicine, 1970
- A METHOD FOR HYPOSPADIAS REPAIRPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1962
- A one-stage operation for hypospadiasBritish Journal of Surgery, 1941