Updated Nomogram to Predict Pathologic Stage of Prostate Cancer Given Prostate-Specific Antigen Level, Clinical Stage, and Biopsy Gleason Score (Partin Tables) Based on Cases from 2000 to 2005
Top Cited Papers
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of 2001 Partin Tables in Turkey: A Multicenter StudyEuropean Urology, 2005
- Cancer Statistics, 2005CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2005
- Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2004
- A Preoperative Nomogram Identifying Decreased Risk of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Is the Prognostic Difference in Gleason Scores 4 3 and 3 4 Independent of the Number of Involved Cores?Journal of Urology, 2002
- How Well Does The Partin Nomogram Predict Pathological Stage After Radical Prostatectomy In A Community Based Population? Results Of The Cancer Of The Prostate Strategic Urological Research EndeavorJournal of Urology, 2002
- VALIDATION OF PARTIN TABLES FOR PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update1997
- The Will Rogers PhenomenonNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Evaluating the yield of medical testsJAMA, 1982