Vowel Formants in Normal and Loud Speech
Authors:
- 21 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 62 (5) , 1278-1295
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated how 1st and 2nd vowel formant frequencies (F1, F2) differ between normal and loud speech in multiple speaking tasks to assess claims that loudness leads to exaggerated vowel articulation. Method: Eleven healthy German-speaking women produced normal and loud speech in 3 tasks that varied in the degree of spontaneity: reading sentences that contained isolated /i: a: u:/, responding to questions that included target words with controlled consonantal contexts but varying vowel qualities, and a recipe recall task. Loudness variation was elicited naturalistically by changing interlocutor distance. First and 2nd formant frequencies and average sound pressure level were obtained from the stressed vowels in the target words, and vowel space area was calculated from /i: a: u:/. Results: Comparisons across many vowels indicated that high, tense vowels showed limited formant variation as a function of loudness. Analysis of /i: a: u:/ across speech tasks revealed vowel space reduction in the recipe retell task compared to the other 2. Loudness changes for F1 were consistent in direction but variable in extent, with few significant results for high tense vowels. Results for F2 were quite varied and frequently not significant. Speakers differed in how loudness and task affected formant values. Finally, correlations between sound pressure level and F1 were generally positive but varied in magnitude across vowels, with the high tense vowels showing very flat slopes. Discussion: These data indicate that naturalistically elicited loud speech in typical speakers does not always lead to changes in vowel formant frequencies and call into question the notion that increasing loudness is necessarily an automatic method of expanding the vowel space. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8061740Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme42015
- Changes to Articulatory Kinematics in Response to Loudness Cues in Individuals With Parkinson’s DiseaseJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2011
- Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Acoustic Characteristics of VowelsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2007
- Voice Quality Changes Following Phonatory-Respiratory Effort Treatment (LSVT®) Versus Respiratory Effort Treatment for Individuals with Parkinson DiseaseJournal of Voice, 2001
- Intentional Changes in Sound Pressure Level and RateJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1998
- Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristicsSpeech Communication, 1996
- Saying consonant clusters quicklyJournal of Phonetics, 1996
- Phonatory and Articulatory Changes Associated With Increased Vocal Intensity in Parkinson Disease: A Case StudyJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1995
- Acoustic–phonetic characteristics of speech produced in noise and while wearing an oxygen maskThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
- Acoustic Theory of Speech Production1971