Deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence for investigating dental professionals' satisfaction with CAD software performance

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the satisfaction of dental professionals, including dental students, dentists, and dental technicians, with computer‐aided design (CAD) software performance using deep learning (DL) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)‐based behavioral analysis concepts.Materials and Methods: This study involved 436 dental professionals with diverse CAD experiences to assess their satisfaction with various dental CAD software programs. Through exploratory factor analysis, latent factors affecting user satisfaction were extracted from the observed variables. A multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP‐ANN) model was developed along with permutation feature importance analysis (PFIA) and the Shapley additive explanation (Shapley) method to gain XAI‐based insights into individual factors' significance and contributions.Results: The MLP‐ANN model outperformed a standard logistic linear regression model, demonstrating high accuracy (95%), precision (84%), and recall rates (84%) in capturing complex psychological problems related to human attitudes. PFIA revealed that design adjustability was the most important factor impacting dental CAD software users' satisfaction. XAI analysis highlighted the positive impacts of features supporting the finish line and crown design, while the number of design steps and installation time had negative impacts. Notably, finish‐line design‐related features and the number of design steps emerged as the most significant factors.Conclusions: This study sheds light on the factors influencing dental professionals' decisions in using and selecting CAD software. This approach can serve as a proof‐of‐concept for applying DL‐XAI‐based behavioral analysis in dentistry and medicine, facilitating informed software selection and development.
Funding Information
  • Korea Medical Device Development Fund

This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit: