Considerations in relation to off-site emergency procedures and response for nuclear accidents
Authors:
- S.F. AshleySAS.F. Ashley
- G.J. VaughanGVG.J. Vaughan
- W.J. NuttallWNW.J. Nuttall
- P.J. ThomasPTP.J. Thomas
Open Access
- 1 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Vol. 112, 77-95
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measuresProcess Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015
- The siting of UK nuclear reactorsJournal of Radiological Protection, 2014
- Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impactsScience of The Total Environment, 2014
- PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS AFTER THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT: RESULTS OF A MENTAL HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE SURVEY THROUGH THE FUKUSHIMA HEALTH MANAGEMENT SURVEY IN FY2011 AND FY2012FUKUSHIMA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014
- ICRP Publication 119: Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60Annals of the ICRP, 2013
- Potential consequences of the Fukushima accident for off-site nuclear emergency management: a case study for GermanyRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2013
- The trade-offs embodied in J-value safety analysisProcess Safety and Environmental Protection, 2010
- Executive SummaryAnnals of the ICRP, 2009
- The Extent of Regulatory Consensus on Health and Safety ExpenditureProcess Safety and Environmental Protection, 2006
- Non-radiological risks of evacuationJournal of Radiological Protection, 1990