Transvenous Defibrillation Leads: High Incidence of Failure During Long‐Term Follow‐Up
Authors:
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 38-43
Abstract
Implantable Defibrillator Lead Failure. Introduction: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) critically depend on correct functioning of their system. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical presentation of transvenous ICD lead failures during long‐term follow‐up. Methods and Results: The study group consisted of 261 consecutive patients who received Medtronic right ventricular polyurethane transvenous leads (models 6884, 6966, 6936) between 1990 and 1998 as part of an abdominal (n = 70) or pectoral (n = 191) ICD system. During mean follow‐up of 4.0 ± 2.6 years , 31 patients (12%) developed a lead‐related sensing failure with oversensing of artifacts. All failures except two were compatible with an insulation defect and occurred late after ICD placement ( 6.0 ± 1.8 years after implant). Lead survival decreased from 98% at 4‐year follow‐up to only 62% at 8‐year follow‐up. Lead survival was not related to patient age, sex, venous lead implantation route, or device implantation site. In 26 (87%) of 31 patients, a sensing defect resulted in inappropriate detection of ventricular fibrillation and subsequent delivery of 3 ± 3 (range 1–11) inappropriate shocks in 19 (61%) of 31 patients. Device interrogation showed artifacts classified as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 21 patients, 40 ± 43 days before clinically relevant failure of the system. One patient with a subclavian crush syndrome required resuscitation because of undersensing of true ventricular fibrillation. Conclusion: Transvenous polyurethane ICD leads showed a high rate of lead insulation failure late after implantation with frequent inappropriate shock deliveries. Close follow‐up is mandatory in patients with these leads. Automated device control features with patient alert function integrated into new devices may contribute to early detection of lead failure.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility and Initial Results of an Internet‐Based Pacemaker and ICD Pulse Generator and Lead RegistryPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2001
- Electrophysiologic Testing to Identify Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Who Are at Risk for Sudden DeathNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Should Lead Explantation Be the Practice Standard When a Lead Needs to Be Replaced?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2000
- Long-term Follow-up of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implanted Under Conscious Sedation in Prepectoral Subfascial PositionCirculation, 1997
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Incidence of ICD Lead Related Complications During Long‐Term Follow‐Up: Comparison of Epicardial and Endocardial Electrode SystemsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Subclavian Crush Syndrome Complicating Transvenous Cardioverter Defibrillator SystemsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Multicenter Experience With a Bipolar Tined Polyurethane Ventricular LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Clinical outcome of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and a multiprogrammable implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted with or without thoracotomy: An international multicenter studyJACC, 1994
- Evaluation of an In‐Line Bipolar Polyurethane Ventricular Pacing LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992