The impact of surgical ablation in patients with low ejection fraction, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation
Authors:
- Niv AdNANiv Ad
- Linda HenryLHLinda Henry
- Sharon HuntSHSharon Hunt
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 40 (1) , 70-76
Abstract
Surgical ablation procedures that use the Cox-Maze procedure lesion set were shown to be very effective. However, many surgeons are reluctant to perform the procedure, especially in high-risk patients such as those with reduced left ventricular (LV) function. This study explored the potential impact of the Cox-Maze III/IV procedure on patients with low ejection fraction (EF<40%) and symptoms of heart failure experiencing atrial fibrillation (AF) who present for cardiac surgery. A prospective study whereby patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF who had surgical ablation were followed. Echocardiograms (echo) were obtained; patients with preoperative EF <40% were included. Health-related quality of life (HRQL-SF-12) and AF symptom severity were obtained at baseline and follow-up. Rhythm was captured by electrocardiogram (EKG) and 24-h Holter. In the past 5 years, 482 patients had surgical ablation (424 full Cox-Maze) of whom 44 patients met the inclusion criteria; however, two patients did not have an available follow-up echo, leaving 42 patients for analysis. Mean age was 61.1 ± 12.9 years, and additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) of 7.5 ± 3.1. There was one operative death, there were no strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) at follow-up, and EF improved from 30 ± 5.0% to 45 ± 13.0% at a mean of 1.5 ± 11.3 months, postoperatively. The return to NSR at time of follow-up echo was 86% (35/40). The physical functioning HRQL scores improved (37.0 ± 12.3 to 46.8 ± 9.1, p = 0.02) at 12 months (population norm = 38.1 ± 9.9) with a significant improvement in symptom severity. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival at 24 months was 87% (confidence interval (CI): 80.4-91.6) (events considered were redo valve replacement, ventricular assist device or death). This is a unique study assessing a high-risk group of patients. Surgical ablation in patients with low EF can be performed in a safe and effective way without added operative risk. Given the potential long-term clinical advantages of a successful surgical ablation in patients with low EF and heart failure, we believe that surgical ablation should be considered in such patients when they present to surgery.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery a Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2009Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2010
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2009 UpdateCirculation, 2009
- Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Functional Status in Rate- Versus Rhythm-Control Strategies for Atrial FibrillationJACC, 2005
- The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant proceduresThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure: Specific Considerations at the Intersection of Two Common and Important Cardiac Disease SetsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2002
- New Surgical and Catheter-Based Modifications of the Maze ProcedureSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Resolution of cardiomyopathy after ablation of atrial flutterJACC, 1998
- The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1991