IVUS-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease
Top Cited Papers
- 11 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 394 (22) , 2189-2199
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Whether intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) guidance during PCI results in better clinical outcomes than conventional angiographic guidance alone is uncertain. In an international, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either IVUS-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite of any stroke, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at the longest follow-up. A total of 806 patients underwent randomization; 401 were assigned to undergo IVUS-guided PCI and 405 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 71.4±10.7 years, 78.4% of the patients were men, and 34.7% had diabetes. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, a primary end-point event had occurred in 135 patients (33.7%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in 125 patients (30.9%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.42; P = 0.40). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization appeared to be similar in the two groups. The percentages of patients with procedure-related and overall safety events also appeared to be similar in the two groups. Among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, IVUS-guided PCI showed no additional benefit over angiography-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. (Funded by Philips Image Guided Therapy Devices and Boston Scientific; OPTIMAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04111770.).Keywords
Funding Information
- Philips Image Guided Therapy Devices
- Boston Scientific Corporation
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Impact of Operator Experience and IVUS Guidance on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Complex PCIJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2023
- 3-Year Outcomes of the ULTIMATE Trial Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2021
- Intravascular Imaging and 12-Month Mortality After Unprotected Left Main Stem PCIJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
- Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
- Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trialThe Lancet, 2020
- Critical Appraisal of Contemporary Clinical Endpoint Definitions in Coronary Intervention TrialsJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2019
- Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)JACC, 2018
- Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2016
- Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary RevascularizationJACC, 2013
- Prospective Application of Pre-Defined Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery LesionsJACC, 2011