Habitat Selection and Post-Release Movement of Reintroduced Brown Treecreeper Individuals in Restored Temperate Woodland
Open Access
- 5 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (12) , e50612
Abstract
It is essential to choose suitable habitat when reintroducing a species into its former range. Habitat quality may influence an individual’s dispersal decisions and also ultimately where they choose to settle. We examined whether variation in habitat quality (quantified by the level of ground vegetation cover and the installation of nest boxes) influenced the movement, habitat choice and survival of a reintroduced bird species. We experimentally reintroduced seven social groups (43 individuals) of the brown treecreeper (Climacteris picumnus) into two nature reserves in south-eastern Australia. We radio-tracked 18 brown treecreepers from release in November 2009 until February 2010. We observed extensive movements by individuals irrespective of the release environment or an individual’s gender. This indicated that individuals were capable of dispersing and actively selecting optimum habitat. This may alleviate pressure on wildlife planners to accurately select the most optimum release sites, so long as the species’ requirements are met. There was significant variation in movement between social groups, suggesting that social factors may be a more important influence on movement than habitat characteristics. We found a significant effect of ground vegetation cover on the likelihood of settlement by social groups, with high rates of settlement and survival in dry forests, rather than woodland (where the species typically resides), which has implications for the success of woodland restoration. However, overall the effects of variation in habitat quality were not as strong as we had expected, and resulted in some unpredicted effects such as low survival and settlement in woodland areas with medium levels of ground vegetation cover. The extensive movement by individuals and unforeseen effects of habitat characteristics make it difficult to predict the outcome of reintroductions, the movement behaviour and habitat selection of reintroduced individuals, particularly when based on current knowledge of a species’ ecology.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- An assessment of scientific approaches towards species relocations in AustraliaAustral Ecology, 2011
- A unified approach to model selection using the likelihood ratio testMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 2010
- Stress: An inevitable component of animal translocationBiological Conservation, 2010
- Influence of livestock grazing on meadow pipit foraging behaviour in upland grasslandBasic and Applied Ecology, 2009
- The effect of translocation on movement behaviour—A test of the assumptions of behavioural studiesBehavioural Processes, 2009
- Movements of translocated captive-bred and released Critically Endangered kaki (black stilts) Himantopus novaezelandiae and the value of long-term post-release monitoringOryx, 2009
- Livestock grazing exclusion and microhabitat variation affect invertebrates and litter decomposition rates in woodland remnantsForest Ecology and Management, 2009
- Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviourOecologia, 2004
- Movement and survival parameters of translocated and resident swift foxes Vulpes veloxAnimal Conservation, 2003
- Mortality and behaviour of hihi, an endangered New Zealand honeyeater, in the establishment phase following translocationBiological Conservation, 1999