Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: multi-center analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes in 659 patients
- 17 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Vol. 12 (3) , 289-297
Abstract
Introduction The endovascular stent-assisted coiling approach for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms is evolving rapidly with the availability of new stent devices. It remains unknown how each type of stent affects the safety and efficacy of the stent-coiling procedure. Methods This study compared the outcomes of endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms using Neuroform (NEU), Enterprise (EP), and Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stents. Patient characteristics, treatment details and angiographic results using the Raymond–Roy grade scale (RRGS), and procedural complications were analyzed in our study. Results Our study included 659 patients with 670 cerebral aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling (NEU, n=182; EP, n=158; LVIS, n=330) that were retrospectively collected from six academic centers. Patient characteristics included mean age 56.3±12.1 years old, female prevalence 73.9%, and aneurysm rupture on initial presentation of 18.8%. We found differences in complete occlusion on baseline imaging, defined as RRGS I, among the three stents: LVIS 64.4%, 210/326; NEU 56.2%, 95/169; EP 47.6%, 68/143; P=0.008. The difference of complete occlusion on 10.5 months (mean) and 8 months (median) angiographic follow-up remained significant: LVIS 84%, 251/299; NEU 78%, 117/150; EP 67%, 83/123; P=0.004. There were 7% (47/670) intra-procedural complications and 11.5% (73/632) post-procedural-related complications in our cohort. Furthermore, procedure-related complications were higher in the braided-stents vs laser-cut, P=0.002. Conclusions There was a great variability in techniques and choice of stent type for stent-assisted coiling among the participating centers. The type of stent was associated with immediate and long-term angiographic outcomes. Randomized prospective trials comparing the different types of stents are warranted.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of stents used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysmsExpert Review of Medical Devices, 2018
- A clinical comparison of Atlas and LVIS Jr stent-assisted aneurysm coilingJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2018
- Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH)Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2018
- Comparison of Recanalization and In-Stent Stenosis Between the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent and Enterprise Stent-Assisted Coiling for 254 Intracranial AneurysmsWorld Neurosurgery, 2018
- Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center clinical and angiographic analysisJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2017
- A survey of intracranial aneurysm treatment practices among United States physiciansJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2017
- Geographic Differences in Endovascular Treatment and Retreatment of Cerebral AneurysmsAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2016
- Preliminary Experience Using the Neuroform Stent for the Treatment of Cerebral AneurysmsNeurosurgery, 2004
- International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured AneurysmsStroke, 2001