Sexual selection driven by direct benefits leads to the erosion of direct benefits
Preprint
Abstract
Most sexual selection models assume that the evolution of female choosiness is driven by indirect (genetic) benefits, such as the production of more viable offspring or more attractive sons. There is ample empirical evidence that female choosiness can also provide direct (non-genetic) benefits, including access to good territories or paternal care. Yet, theoretical models of direct-benefits sexual selection are scarce. Here, we use individual-based evolutionary simulations to explore the joint evolution of female mating preferences and male ornamentation under sexual selection driven by direct benefits. We find that, within each generation, male ornamentation reliably indicates paternal quality (the direct benefit); females thus benefit from being choosy and readily evolve preferences for male ornamentation. Yet this in turn selects for males to invest resources in ornamentation at the expense of paternal care. Across generations, female selection for ornamented males (driven by the pursuit of direct benefits) thus erodes the very benefit it seeks, leading to population decline and potentially extinction. Our results highlight the complexity and non-intuitive nature of direct-benefits sexual selection.Keywords
Funding Information
- GELIFES scholarship
- European Research Council (789240)
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- A reexamination of theoretical arguments that indirect selection on mate preference is likely to be weaker than direct selectionEvolution Letters, 2022
- The Evolution of Animal Nuptial Gifts2012
- Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual reviewBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011
- Direct Benefits and the Evolution of Female Mating Preferences2011
- Female ornamentation, parental quality, and competitive ability in the rock sparrowJournal of Ethology, 2010
- Female seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, remate for male-supplied water rather than ejaculate nutritionBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009
- How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection?The Science of Nature, 2001
- Good Parent and Good Genes Models of Handicap EvolutionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1999
- Sexual selection when the female directly benefitsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1993
- Mate selection—A selection for a handicapJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1975