Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach
Open Access
- 3 June 2019
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 29 (4) , 561-567
Abstract
Both the open and endovascular techniques are commonly used for harvesting the radial artery (ORAH and ERAH, respectively), and yet, very little is known about the effects of these 2 techniques on endothelial integrity and function of the radial artery (RA). The aim of this study was to assess the endothelial integrity and function of RA harvested using the 2 approaches. Two independent surgical teams working in the same institution routinely use the RA for coronary artery bypass grafting exclusively employing either ORAH or ERAH. Thirty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled in this comparative study. Endothelial function after ORAH or ERAH was assessed by using the wire myograph system. The integrity of the RA endothelium was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for erythroblast transformation specific-related gene. The vasodilation in response to acetylcholine was significantly higher in RA harvested with ORAH (P ≤ 0.001 versus ERAH). Endothelial integrity was not different between the 2 groups. ORAH is associated with a significantly higher endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Further investigation on the potential implications of these findings in terms of graft spasm and patency as well as clinical outcomes are needed.Keywords
Funding Information
- Weill Cornell Clinical and Translational Science Centre
- National Institutes of Health (R01HL126913)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endothelial integrity of radial artery grafts harvested by minimally invasive surgery — immunohistochemical studies of CD31 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expressions: a randomized controlled trial☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Vasoreactivity and histology of the radial artery: comparison of open versus endoscopic approachesEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Vascular Adhesion Molecules in AtherosclerosisArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2007
- Endoscopic Versus Conventional Radial Artery Harvest-Is Smaller Better?Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2006
- Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Functional and histologic assessment of the conduitThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Midterm Angiographic Patency and Vasoreactive Profile of Proximal Versus Distal Radial Artery GraftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Characteristics of adrenoceptors in the human radial artery: Clinical implicationsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1998
- Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- Reactivity of the Canine Isolated Internal Mammary Artery, Saphenous Vein, and Coronary Artery to Constrictor and Dilator SubstancesJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1988
- Intimal HyperplasiaThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1975