Prognostic Potential of the NRF2 Transcription Factor in Canine Mammary Neoplasms
Authors:
- Vitor de Moraes Pina de CarvalhoVitor de Moraes Pina de Carvalho
- Anna Hielm-BjörkmanAHAnna Hielm-Björkman
- Karine Araújo DamascenoKDKarine Araújo Damasceno
- Thanielle Novaes FontesTFThanielle Novaes Fontes
- Carlos Humberto da Costa Vieira-FilhoCVCarlos Humberto da Costa Vieira-Filho
- Simone NunesSNSimone Nunes
- Diego Carlos dos ReisDRDiego Carlos dos Reis
- Robin MooreRMRobin Moore
- Stella Maria Barrouin-MeloSBStella Maria Barrouin-Melo
- Geovanni Dantas CassaliGCGeovanni Dantas Cassali
- Alessandra Estrela-LimaAEAlessandra Estrela-Lima
Open Access
Abstract
Research based on the similarities between canine and human mammary tumors should extend beyond clinical, pathophysiological, epidemiological, and histopathological characteristics to include applicable molecular markers with prognostic significance. However, despite shared similarities, important differences must also be considered in comparative and translational studies. The nuclear erythroid 2-related factor (NRF2), a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of antioxidant proteins, is pathologically activated during carcinogenesis. The role of NRF2 in human breast cancer is well established, making it a potential prognostic marker. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate NRF2 tissue expression in mammary neoplasms of female dogs and its association with tumor progression, other prognostic factors, and survival. Methods: A group of 57 female dogs was studied. Tissue samples of mammary glands from 10 healthy dogs and 47 dogs with mammary neoplasms (39 malignant tumors and 8 benign tumors) were examined for NRF2 immunoexpression. Clinicopathological data and immunohistochemical expression, assessed by histochemical score (H-score), were correlated. Results: NRF2 tissue expression showed a predominantly cytoplasmic distribution and a lower H-score in tumors with higher malignancy grading. Dogs with higher NRF2 H-scores had improved survival rates (p = 0.0036). Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between H-scores < 135 and behavior (p = 0.007), tumor size (p = 0.001), and Ki-67 index (p = 0.018). Conclusions: These results suggest that NRF2 also holds prognostic value in the evaluation of canine mammary tumors.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (BOL0147/2021)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (RED-00031-21)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (310248/2021-3)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (303368/2021-7)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (312022/2021-2)
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prognostic value of NRF2 in breast cancer patients: a systematic review with meta-analysisBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019
- NRF2 and the Hallmarks of CancerCancer Cell, 2018
- Canine invasive mammary carcinomas as models of human breast cancer. Part 1: natural history and prognostic factorsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017
- Nrf2-peroxiredoxin I axis in polymorphous adenocarcinoma is associated with low matrix metalloproteinase 2 levelVirchows Archiv, 2017
- The see-saw of Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in cancerCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2017
- Expression of LC3, LAMP2, KEAP1 and NRF2 in Salivary Adenoid Cystic CarcinomaPathology and Oncology Research, 2015
- Understanding of the immunological heterogeneity of canine mammary carcinomas to provide immunophenotypic features of circulating leukocytes as clinically relevant prognostic biomarkersBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011
- Molecular mechanisms of Nrf2‐mediated antioxidant responseMolecular Carcinogenesis, 2008
- Increasing oxidative damage and loss of mismatch repair enzymes during breast carcinogenesisEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2006
- A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic testsJournal of Immunological Methods, 1995