Many are the ways to learn identifying multi-modal behavioral profiles of collaborative learning in constructivist activities
Open Access
- 1 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
- Vol. 16 (4) , 485-523
Abstract
Understanding the way learners engage with learning technologies, and its relation with their learning, is crucial for motivating design of effective learning interventions. Assessing the learners’ state of engagement, however, is non-trivial. Research suggests that performance is not always a good indicator of learning, especially with open-ended constructivist activities. In this paper, we describe a combined multi-modal learning analytics and interaction analysis method that uses video, audio and log data to identify multi-modal collaborative learning behavioral profiles of 32 dyads as they work on an open-ended task around interactive tabletops with a robot mediator. These profiles, which we name Expressive Explorers, Calm Tinkerers, and Silent Wanderers, confirm previous collaborative learning findings. In particular, the amount of speech interaction and the overlap of speech between a pair of learners are behavior patterns that strongly distinguish between learning and non-learning pairs. Delving deeper, findings suggest that overlapping speech between learners can indicate engagement that is conducive to learning. When we more broadly consider learner affect and actions during the task, we are better able to characterize the range of behavioral profiles exhibited among those who learn. Specifically, we discover two behavioral dimensions along which those who learn vary, namely, problem solving strategy (actions) and emotional expressivity (affect). This finding suggests a relation between problem solving strategy and emotional behavior; one strategy leads to more frustration compared to another. These findings have implications for the design of real-time learning interventions that support productive collaborative learning in open-ended tasks.Keywords
Funding Information
- EPFL Lausanne
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCLEducational Psychologist, 2013
- Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effectApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2010
- Design and Reflection Help Students Develop Scientific Abilities: Learning in Introductory Physics LaboratoriesJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2010
- Productive FailureCognition and Instruction, 2008
- Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)Educational Psychologist, 2007
- Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based TeachingEducational Psychologist, 2006
- When Smart Groups FailJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2003
- Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-AnalysisReview of Educational Research, 2001
- A Time For TellingCognition and Instruction, 1998
- Doing With Understanding: Lessons From Research on Problem- and Project-Based LearningJournal of the Learning Sciences, 1998