Measuring Psychosocial Variables in Patients With (Sub) Acute Low Back Pain Complaints, at Risk for Chronicity
Authors:
- Hans HeneweerHHHans Heneweer
- Nienke J. van WoudenbergNWNienke J. van Woudenberg
- Frank van GenderenFGFrank van Genderen
- Luc VanheesLVLuc Vanhees
- Harriet WittinkHWHarriet Wittink
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 35 (4) , 447-452
Abstract
A validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire Dutch Language Version (ALBPSQ-DLV). To determine internal consistency, construct and convergent validity of the ALBPSQ-DLV in a population of patients with (sub) acute low back pain (LBP) referred to primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. Viewing LBP as a multifactorial biopsychosocial syndrome enhances the need for validating instruments for screening psychosocial variables in patients with LBP. The ALBPSQ has been specifically constructed as a self-administered screening instrument, based on variables that have been suggested as a risk factor in the literature. A total of 69 patients with (sub) acute LBP were recruited. Internal consistency of the ALBPSQ-DLV was determined by calculating Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined by applying exploratory factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficients between domains of ALBPSQ-DLV and Dutch language versions of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Coping Inventory, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, and the Visual Analogue Scale of pain intensity. Internal consistency of the ALBPSQ-DLV was 0.81. Values of the various subscales ranged between 0.48 and 0.88. Convergent validity was confirmed by moderate to good correlation coefficients (P = 0.01) between the scores on the subscales and the constructs of pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, and coping (r = 0.38-0.64). Exploratory factor analysis, suppressing absolute values less than 0.40, revealed components which were in agreement with the various domains of the original ALBPSQ. The internal consistency and both construct and convergent validity of the ALBPSQ-DLV are well established in a Dutch population of 69 patients with (sub) acute nonspecific LBP referred to primary care physical therapy.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Clusters in Acute, Work-Related Back Pain Based on Patterns of Disability Risk FactorsJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2007
- The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific EvidenceJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2006
- Do psychological factors increase the risk for back pain in the general population in both a cross‐sectional and prospective analysis?European journal of pain, 2005
- Do Physical Therapists in the United Kingdom Recognize Psychosocial Factors in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain?Spine, 2005
- Screening to Identify Patients at RiskThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2005
- Early Identification of Patients at Risk of Developing a Persistent Back Problem: The Predictive Validity of The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain QuestionnaireThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2003
- Advances in the Field of Low Back Pain in Primary CareSpine, 2002
- Biopsychosocial Screening Questionnaire for Patients With Low Back Pain: Preliminary Report of Utility in Physiotherapy Practice in Northern IrelandThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2000
- Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settingsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The NetherlandsPain, 1995