Young Australians’ receptiveness to discussing sexual health with a general practitioner

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Most sexual health care in Australia is provided through general practice. However, many young Australians experience barriers to accessing sexual health care. This research examines young Australians’ receptiveness to discussing sexual health with a general practitioner (GP). Methods: We conducted an anonymous online sexual health survey (open 2 May to 21 June 2022). Anyone living in Australia aged 16–29 years was eligible to participate. Participants were recruited via social media and asked whether they agreed with five statements exploring their receptivity to discussing sexual health with GPs. We explored characteristics associated with responses using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 1915 participants, 69.3% were cisgender women, with a median age of 20 years; 48.5% were heterosexual. Approximately one-fifth agreed they might not tell a GP the whole truth about their sexual history, would be worried about confidentiality when discussing their sexual history and would be too embarrassed to see their usual GP if they thought they had a sexually transmitted infection. Over half (55.8%) agreed they would be comfortable with a GP bringing up sexual health in an unrelated consultation, but 39.6% would be nervous to bring up sexual health in case they needed an intimate examination. Multivariate regression identified several characteristics associated with responses. Notably, having a school-based sex education and a usual GP were factors associated with increased receptivity to discussing sexual health. Conclusions: Young Australians were generally open to discussing sexual health with a GP. School-based sex education and GP–patient relationships are key to promoting sexual health among young people.
Funding Information
  • University of Melbourne internal funding, Population Health Investing in Research Students’ Training Scheme (NA)

This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit: