Surgical excision margins in primary cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 47 (7) , 1558-1574
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Melanoma Institute Australia
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2011
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2011
- Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous MelanomaArchives of Surgery, 2007
- Excision Margins in High-Risk Malignant MelanomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Surgical margins in cutaneous melanoma (2 cm versus 5 cm for lesions measuring less than 2.1‐mm thick)Cancer, 2003
- Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: Long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trialAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 1996
- Efficacy of 2-cm Surgical Margins for Intermediate-Thickness Melanomas (1 to 4 mm) Results of a Multi-institutional Randomized Surgical TrialAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Narrow Excision (1-cm Margin)Archives of Surgery, 1991
- Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant MelanomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988