A randomized, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast‐acting insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in adults with type 1 diabetes (onset 5)
Open Access
- 9 December 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Vol. 21 (4) , 961-967
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs insulin aspart (IAsp) used in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods: This was a double‐blind, treat‐to‐target, randomized, 16‐week trial investigating CSII treatment with faster aspart (n = 236) or IAsp (n = 236). All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used for the evaluation of effect. Results: Faster aspart was non‐inferior to IAsp regarding the change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; primary endpoint). The mean HbA1c changed from 58.4 mmol/mol (7.5%) at baseline to 57.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with faster aspart and to 56.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with IAsp after 16 weeks' treatment, with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of 1.0 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14; 1.87) or 0.09% (95% CI 0.01; 0.17; P < 0.001) for non‐inferiority (0.4% margin; P < 0.02 for statistical significance in favour of IAsp). Faster aspart was superior to IAsp in change from baseline in 1‐hour postprandial glucose (PPG) increment after a meal test (ETD −0.91 mmol/L [95% CI −1.43; −0.39] or −16.4 mg/dL [95% CI −25.7; −7.0]; P = 0.001), with statistically significant reductions also at 30 minutes and 2 hours. The improvement in PPG was reflected in the change from baseline in 1‐hour interstitial glucose increment after all meals (ETD −0.21 mmol/L [95% CI −0.31; −0.11] or −3.77 mg/dL [95% CI −5.53; −2.01]). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia (estimated rate ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.85; 1.16]). A numerical imbalance in severe hypoglycaemic episodes between faster aspart and IAsp was seen in the treatment (21 vs 7) and 4‐week run‐in periods (4 vs 0). Conclusions: Faster aspart provides an effective and safe option for CSII treatment in T1D.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigation of Pump Compatibility of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 1 DiabetesJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2017
- Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Improves Glycemic Control in Basal-Bolus Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes: Results of a 26-Week Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Treat-to-Target, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial (onset 1)Diabetes Care, 2017
- A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 DiabetesClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2017
- Improved Postprandial Glycemic Control with Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin InfusionDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2017
- Pharmacological properties of faster‐acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover trialDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2016
- The Need for Faster InsulinJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2016
- Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic RegistryDiabetes Care, 2015
- Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report of a Workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine SocietyDiabetes Care, 2013
- Management of diabetes mellitus: is the pump mightier than the pen?Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2012
- Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitusCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010