Single Center Experience on Endovascular Treatment of Occlusion and/or Stenosis of Bilateral Carotid Arteries
Authors:
- Şule DalkiliçŞule Dalkiliç
- Sena Boncuk UlaşSena Boncuk Ulaş
- Levent AvciLevent Avci
- Beyza Nur BozkurtBBBeyza Nur Bozkurt
- Alihan Abdullah AkbaşAlihan Abdullah Akbaş
- Vasfiye SezerVSVasfiye Sezer
- Esra ÜnalEsra Ünal
- Ayşe Kristina PolatAPAyşe Kristina Polat
- Semanur AksuSemanur Aksu
- Derya Kara GençDGDerya Kara Genç
- Halil Alper EryilmazHalil Alper Eryilmaz
- Türkan AcarTürkan Acar
Open Access
- 26 March 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Brain and Behavior
- Vol. 15 (3) , e70395
Abstract
Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis is the presence of 50% or more stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA) according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria and is one of the leading etiological factors of ischemic stroke. The severity of stenosis is associated with stroke risk. The prevalence of bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) varies. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with carotid artery stenting in patients with BCAS or occlusion in a comprehensive stroke center.Methods: The data of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) between January 2020 and September 2024 were scanned. The demographic data and comorbidities were noted from the patients’ files. Then, the patients were divided into two groups. The first group is “bilateral 50%–99% ICA stenosis” and the second group is “one side ICA occluded contralateral side ICA ≥50% stenosis”. Both groups were also listed as symptomatic and asymptomatic. Demographic and endovascular procedure data were analyzed.Results: A total of 82 patients were included in this study, 69 male (84.14%) and 13 female (15.85%). The mean age was 69.46 ± 7.24. Hypertension (HT) was the most common comorbid disease (69.51%). Sixty‐six patients (80.50%) were symptomatic and 16 (19.50%) were asymptomatic. TIA developed in one patient in the first group. Two minor (The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 1–3) and two major strokes developed in the second group. Only three patients (two in the first group, one in the second group) underwent postdilatation balloon angioplasty.Conclusion: Endovascular treatment seems to be an acceptable strategy in comprehensive stroke centers where the possible complication risks can be well managed in this group of patients.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of results of simultaneous bilateral carotid artery stentingJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2019
- Relationship Between Carotid Stenosis and Infarct Volume in Ischemic Stroke PatientsMedical Science Monitor, 2016
- Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2016
- Peri-procedural Risk with Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting: A Population based Swedvasc StudyEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2015
- Treatment Strategy for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis: 2 Cases of Carotid Endarterectomy for the Symptomatic Side Followed by Carotid StentingJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2014
- Contemporary incidence and risk factors for carotid artery disease in patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgeryJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2012
- Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Single Versus Bilateral Carotid Artery Disease and Factors Affecting Midterm OutcomeAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 2011
- Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Past, Present and FutureEuropean Neurology, 2006
- Cerebral Ischemia after Filter-Protected Carotid Artery Stenting Is Common and Cannot Be Predicted by the Presence of Substantial Amount of Debris Captured by the Filter Device2006
- The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy TrialStroke, 1999