Age‐specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid‐based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials
Open Access
- 6 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 117 (9) , 1067-1073
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Castle P, Bulten J, Confortini M, Klinkhamer P, Pellegrini A, Siebers A, Ronco G, Arbyn M. Age‐specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid‐based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials. BJOG 2010;117:1067–1073.Objective To investigate the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cell samples in liquid‐based cytology (LBC) versus conventional cytology (CC) by age.Design Randomised clinical trials.Setting Population‐based cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands and Italy.Population Asymptomatic women invited for screening enrolled in two randomised trials: Netherlands ThinPrep® versus conventional cytology (NETHCON; 39 010 CC, 46 064 LBC) and New Technologies in Cervical Cancer Screening (NTCC; 22 771 CC, 22 403 LBC).Methods Comparison of categorical variables using Pearson’s chi‐square test, logistic regression and trend tests.Main outcome measures Proportion of unsatisfactory samples, ratio of LBC versus CC, and variation by 5‐year group.Results In NETHCON, a lower percentage of LBC samples were judged to be unsatisfactory compared with CC samples (0.33 versus 1.11%). There was no significant trend in unsatisfactory results by age group for conventional cytology (Ptrend = 0.54), but there was a trend towards an increasing percentage of unsatisfactory results with increasing age for LBC (Ptrend < 0.001). In NTCC, a lower percentage of LBC samples were judged to be unsatisfactory compared with conventional cytology (2.59 versus 4.10%). There was a decrease in the unsatisfactory results by age group with conventional cytology (Ptrend < 0.001) and with LBC (Ptrend = 0.01), although the latter trend arose from the 55–60‐years age group (Ptrend = 0.62 when excluding this group).Conclusions The clinical trial in which the results were collected and the cytologic method used were the most important determinants of unsatisfactory cytology. In all situations, the proportion of unsatisfactory samples was lower in LBC compared with CC. The effects of age depended on the criteria used to define unsatisfactory results.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process performance of cervical screening programmes in EuropeEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Unsatisfactory SurePath liquid‐based Papanicolaou testsCancer Cytopathology, 2009
- Cytologic Detection of Cervical Abnormalities Using Liquid-Based Compared With Conventional CytologyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1Cytopathology, 2008
- Cervical Cytology Specimen AdequacyJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2008
- Liquid Compared With Conventional Cervical CytologyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- The New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial. An overview of results during the first phase of recruitmentGynecologic Oncology, 2007
- European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid‐based cytology*Cytopathology, 2007
- Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2004